The proof of physical pain in procedural law: a look from neuroscientific evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/lucerna.n5.26684Keywords:
pain, damage, neuroscience, neurotechnology, fMRI, bodily harm, physical pain, expert evidenceAbstract
A qualitative research, documentary and analytical in nature, is presented. It starts from the perspective that physical pain, when evaluated in terms of law (pain test), is evaluated and analyzed from a content of subjectivity; That is why it is intended to provide an approach on how to improve the efficiency of its evaluation (make it more objective) using other tools that go beyond the classic way in which expertise is established, in this case from the perspective of neurosciences, specifically with the use of neuroscientific (neurotechnological) tests that exist today. This is how the approach of law to the exact sciences is proposed, to propose new concepts or proposals that add to the legal system.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hanssel Vega
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
- The authors retain their rights to the work, trademark and patent, and also to any process or procedure described in the article.
- The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in Lucerna Iuris et Investigatio (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Lucerna Iuris et Investigatio .
- The authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, conference notes, thesis, or part of a book), provided that indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
