The penalty for the provision of services to the community, as a positive alternative and the creation of a national registry, for its effective application

Authors

  • Jesús Josué Ramos Falcón Colegio de Abogados de Lima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/lucerna.v0i1.18374

Keywords:

Provision of community services, national register

Abstract

The penalty of providing the service to the community in its various thematic components is studied: its regulation, degree of application, dogmatic development. Its advantages are examined in relation to the benefits of rehabilitation, reeducation and resocialization of the convicted. Among the main causes of its minimal application are: poor doctrinal development; the imprecise regulatory regulation on conversion, the lack of dissemination as an alternative penalty to the custodial sentence. Finally, it should be noted that the penalty for rendering services to the community is more effective and productive than the reservation of the conviction and the suspension of the execution of the sentence. Despite legislative changes on the penalty of providing the service to the community; It is imminently the application of a control and registration of these convicted through the creation of a National Registry of Sentenced to the penalty of providing services to the community “RENSPSC” with the use of virtual tools. The Registry of these convicted persons would allow to have updated information, in real time, on the receiving entities, modalities of compliance with the penalty, degree of compliance; Courts issuing the judgment, among other variables.

Author Biography

  • Jesús Josué Ramos Falcón, Colegio de Abogados de Lima

    Abogado por el Colegio de Abogados de Lima, Perito por el Colegio Nacional de Peritos en Accidentología Vial. Egresado de la Maestría en Ciencias Penales, por la UNMSM; actualmente, ejerzo la formación académica y profesional.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The penalty for the provision of services to the community, as a positive alternative and the creation of a national registry, for its effective application. (2021). Lucerna Iuris Et Investigatio, 1, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.15381/lucerna.v0i1.18374