Good choises and failures of the children’s rights Convention

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/lucerna.n2.22800

Keywords:

Adolescent, Childhood, Child, Difference, Equality, Human Rights

Abstract

This article is part of a previous study regarding human rights during minority age, a problem that is not unaware to our socio-legal system, even within the framework of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which is a benchmark for changing the model of protection for children and adolescents. Thus, understanding childhood as a substructure favors recognizing that the group of boys, girls and adolescents remains in an area where human rights are affected, based on their natural and contextual vulnerability, so that the contributions taken into account openness to dialogue regarding the condition of active holders that in our socio-legal system does not reach the group of children and adolescents, and allows reaffirming that in accordance with the universal scope of human rights, a protection model is guaranteed in which family, society and the State act synchronously in the recognition of human rights during minority, through mechanisms that guarantee the condition of active owner with respect to their human rights.

Author Biography

  • Debora Katy Monge Hernandez, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima, Peru

    Abogada por la Universidad Alas Peruanas. Egresada UPG Derecho de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Good choises and failures of the children’s rights Convention. (2022). Lucerna Iuris Et Investigatio, 1(2), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.15381/lucerna.n2.22800