Meetings and disagreements of exchange exceptions in the single execution process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/lucerna.n5.27115Keywords:
Security title, exchange exception, formal exception, opposition, extinction of the obligationAbstract
The research proposal is to demystify: The antinomy that exists between the causes of contradiction stipulated in article 19 of the Securities Law versus article 690-D of the Peruvian Civil Procedure Code.
Jurisdictional protection is above – and there is no doubt – any regulatory algorithm and is the touchstone of good action by a judge. It is true that economic circulation and legal security is absolute relevance; but what if there are no judicial guarantees for the defendant (executed).
Downloads
Published
2023-12-30
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alexander Camus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
- The authors retain their rights to the work, trademark and patent, and also to any process or procedure described in the article.
- The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in Lucerna Iuris et Investigatio (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Lucerna Iuris et Investigatio .
- The authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, conference notes, thesis, or part of a book), provided that indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
How to Cite
Meetings and disagreements of exchange exceptions in the single execution process. (2023). Lucerna Iuris Et Investigatio, 1(5), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.15381/lucerna.n5.27115
