Alternative cryoprotectans suitable for a slow freezing method of epididymal spermatozoa of alpaca (Vicugna pacos)

Authors

  • Nadia Canorio Pariona Laboratorio de Fisiología de la Reproducción Animal (LFRA), Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima
  • Fernando Paredes Arnedo Laboratorio de Fisiología de la Reproducción Animal (LFRA), Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima
  • Martha Valdivia Cuya Laboratorio de Fisiología de la Reproducción Animal (LFRA), Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v26i3.11185

Keywords:

alpaca, sperm, cryopreservation, dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide

Abstract

The objective of this study was to use alternative cryoprotectans suitable for freezing epididymal spermatozoa of alpaca (Vicugna pacos) in a slow freezing method. Epididymides obtained in the slaughterhouse of Huancavelica city were transported at 4 °C in saline solution to the laboratory in Lima, Peru. The sperm cells were extracted from the epididymis and incubated in HAMF10 medium. The Tes-Tris-Yolk-Citrate medium was used and supplemented with the cryoprotectants dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO4) at 0.5, 0.25 and 0.125M concentrations, and dimethylacetamide (DMA) at 0.75, 0.385 and 0.18M concentrations, and compared with a control group cryopreserved with glycerol 0.6M. Motility, viability and integrity of membrane before and after freezing were assessed. The results showed a better viability and membrane integrity post-freezing when using DMA 0.375M (p<0.05). Motility was better with Me2SO4 0.25 and 05M and DMA 0.375 and 0.75M (p<0.05).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-14

Issue

Section

Artículos Primarios

How to Cite

Canorio Pariona, N., Paredes Arnedo, F., & Valdivia Cuya, M. (2015). Alternative cryoprotectans suitable for a slow freezing method of epididymal spermatozoa of alpaca (Vicugna pacos). Revista De Investigaciones Veterinarias Del Perú, 26(3), 434-443. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v26i3.11185