Effect of dietary probiotic, prebiotic and their combination on the productive performance of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus)

Authors

  • Cynthia Valdizán G. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Laboratorio de Bioquímica, Nutrición Animal y Alimentación Animal. Lima, Perú
  • Fernando Carcelén C. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Laboratorio de Bioquímica, Nutrición Animal y Alimentación Animal. Lima, Perú
  • Miguel Ara G. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Laboratorio de Bioquímica, Nutrición Animal y Alimentación Animal. Lima, Perú
  • Sandra Bezada Q. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Laboratorio de Bioquímica, Nutrición Animal y Alimentación Animal. Lima, Perú
  • Ronald Jiménez A. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Laboratorio de Bioquímica, Nutrición Animal y Alimentación Animal. Lima, Perú
  • Ana Ascencio M. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Laboratorio de Bioquímica, Nutrición Animal y Alimentación Animal. Lima, Perú
  • Jorge Guevara V. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Química e Ingeniería Química, Escuela Académico Profesional de Ingeniería Agroindustrial. Lima, Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v30i2.16071

Keywords:

guinea pig; probiotic; prebiotic; symbiotic; El Mantaro

Abstract

The present study evaluated the effect of the inclusion of probiotic, prebiotic and the combination of both (symbiotic) in the diet on the productive parameters of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). Fifty 3-day-old male guinea pigs were selected from a Prolific-Dairy maternal line developed in the IVITA-El Mantaro Research Station (Peru) and randomly distributed in five treatments consisting of a basal diet of forages (rye-grass and red clover). supplemented with wheat bran (T5), plus probiotic (T1), prebiotic (T2), symbiotic (T3) and antibiotic growth-promoter (AGP) (T4). The probiotic was a mixture of six bacterial species isolated from the intestine and guinea pig faeces; the prebiotic was a commercial mannanoligosaccharide and the APC was Zn-bacitracin. The response to treatments was evaluated for 56 days in terms of body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio. No significant or consistent responses were observed as effect of the treatments. The lack of response to AGP and the good body weight gains obtained suggested that, under the conditions of the study, the intestinal microbial balance of the animals was appropriate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-04

Issue

Section

Artículos Primarios

How to Cite

Valdizán G., C., Carcelén C., F., Ara G., M., Bezada Q., S., Jiménez A., R., Ascencio M., A., & Guevara V., J. (2019). Effect of dietary probiotic, prebiotic and their combination on the productive performance of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). Revista De Investigaciones Veterinarias Del Perú, 30(2), 590-597. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v30i2.16071