Prevalence and morphometry of Eimeria spp in guinea pigs from Chota, Cajamarca
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v34i2.21560Keywords:
Chota, Cavia porcellus, Eimeria, morphometry, prevalenceAbstract
This study determine the prevalence of Eimeria spp and performs the morphometric study of the oocysts found in the faeces of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from commercial family-rearing farms in the district of Chota, Cajamarca, Peru. The study was conducted between August and October 2014. In total, 285 faecal samples were obtained regardless of sex, age and type of guinea pigs in eight communities. The samples were processed using the Sheather technique and the morphometric study of the oocysts was carried out by microscopic observation at 40X using a micrometric eyepiece with a correction factor of 1.64. Oocyst sporulation was induced with 2.5% potassium dichromate. The prevalence of Eimeria spp was 25%. The average of ovoid-shaped oocysts was 17.46 µm long and 17.25 µm wide and for ellipsoidal oocysts it was 23.40 µm long and 17.8 µm wide. The morphometric characteristics indicate that it would be Eimeria caviae.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Severino Torrel Pajares, Santos Estela Collantes, Juan Rojas-Moncada, César Murga-Moreno, Luis Vargas-Rocha
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. Authors retain their trade mark rights and patent, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. Authors retain their right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article (eg, to place their article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú (RIVEP).
c. Authors retain theirs right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part thereof (eg a compilation of his papers, lecture notes, thesis, or a book), always indicating the source of publication (the originator of the work, journal, volume, number and date).