Exploratory and factorial analysis of the ‘Questionnaire of psychosocial factors at work’ in Peru

Authors

  • Manuel Pando Moreno Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Salud Pública, (México)
  • Walter Varillas Sociólogo, Maestría (egr.) en Políticas Públicas Gestión de Proyectos Sociales y en Salud Ocupacional, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, (Perú)
  • Carolina Aranda Beltrán Doctora en Salud Pública, Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Salud Pública, (México)
  • Fernanda Elizalde Núñez Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Salud Pública, (México)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/anales.v77i4.12649

Keywords:

Questionnaire of Psychosocial Factors, Validation, Reliability.

Abstract

Introduction. The evaluation of negative psychosocial factors or psychosocial risk factors is a lengthy process, but the majority of methods rely on the use of an instrument or scale, of which we find a wide diversity. However, few have been designed and validated to be applied in Latin America. Objective. To validate an instrument of evaluation of psychosocial factors for its application in workers in Peru. Design. Exploratory factorial analysis of the Questionnaire of Psychosocial Factors at Work with a population of Peruvian workers. Participants. Lima, Arequipa and Trujillo workers. The population consisted in 542 subjects working in construction, textile industry, education services, health, mining, fisheries and agroindustry among others. The statistical analysis was based on the determination of the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, percentage of variance explained and the eigenvalues of each item of the scale. Results. The Cronbach α coefficient of the questionnaire in general was 0.9, indicating excellent reliability, being above the results of other similar scales. Individually most of the 7 factors of the questionnaire obtained satisfactory values. Those that presented Cronbach’s alpha below 0.7 were ‘Workload’ α = .5, that would qualify as ‘Inadequate’ and ‘Content and characteristics of the task’ with α = .6, qualifying as ‘Adequate but with deficits’. Conclusions. It is possible to use the ‘Questionnaire of Psychosocial Factors at Work’ for the purposes of research and evaluation in companies in Peru.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-16

Issue

Section

Artículo Original

How to Cite

1.
Pando Moreno M, Varillas W, Aranda Beltrán C, Elizalde Núñez F. Exploratory and factorial analysis of the ‘Questionnaire of psychosocial factors at work’ in Peru. An Fac med [Internet]. 2016 Dec. 16 [cited 2024 Jul. 17];77(4):365-71. Available from: https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/12649