Clinical practice guideline for the surgical treatment of patients with urolithiasis for the Peruvian Social Security (EsSalud)

Authors

  • Wilson Pereyra Velásquez Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud. Lima, Perú
  • Cristian Romero Hinostroza Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud. Lima, Perú
  • Giomar Farfán Daza Hospital Nacional Alberto Sabogal Sologuren, EsSalud. Lima, Perú
  • Percy Pérez Peralta Hospital II Lima Norte Callao Luis Negreiros Vega, EsSalud. Lima, Perú
  • Elizabeth Corrales Acosta Hospital II Alberto Leopoldo Barton Thompson, EsSalud. Lima, Perú
  • José Grández Urbina Investigador independiente
  • José Montes-Alvis Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación, EsSalud. Lima, Perú
  • Carlos Alva-Díaz Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación, EsSalud. Lima, Perú
  • Wendy Nieto-Gutierrez Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación, EsSalud. Lima, Perú
  • Marcelo Denilson Baptistussi Instituto de Capacitação, Ensino e Pesquisa em Saude (ICEPS). Sao Paulo, Brasil
  • Alvaro Taype-Rondan Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación, EsSalud. Lima, Perú
  • Raúl Timaná-Ruiz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/anales.v80i4.17255

Keywords:

Urolitiasis, Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos, Guía de Práctica Clínica, Enfoque GRADE, Medicina Basada en la Evidencia

Abstract

Introduction. This article summarizes the clinical practice guide (CPG) for the surgical treatment of patients with urolithiasis in the Social Security of Peru (EsSalud). Objective. To provide clinical recommendations based on evidence for the surgical treatment of patients with urolithiasis in EsSalud. Method. A guideline group (GEG) constituted by urologists and methodologists was formed, who formulated the clinical questions that were answered within the present CPG. For each of these questions systematic searches of systematic reviews and primary studies (when considered pertinent) were carried out in PubMed during 2018. The evidence was selected to answer each one of the clinical questions posed, later the certainty was evaluated of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Regular work meetings were scheduled, in which the GEG reviewed the evidence and made recommendations, points of good clinical practice, and flow charts; using the GRADE methodology. The CPG was approved with Resolution No. 66-IETSI-ESSALUD-2018. Results. Six clinical questions on the subject of surgical treatment in urolithiasis were addressed. Based on these questions, 5 recommendations were formulated (2 strong recommendations and 3 conditional recommendations), 21 points of good clinical practice, and 3 management flow charts. Conclusion. This article summarizes the methodology and conclusions based on evidence from the CPG for the surgical treatment of patients with urolithiasis in EsSalud.

Published

2019-12-27

Issue

Section

Guías de Práctica Clínica

How to Cite

1.
Pereyra Velásquez W, Romero Hinostroza C, Farfán Daza G, Pérez Peralta P, Corrales Acosta E, Grández Urbina J, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the surgical treatment of patients with urolithiasis for the Peruvian Social Security (EsSalud). An Fac med [Internet]. 2019 Dec. 27 [cited 2024 Jul. 17];80(4):528-36. Available from: https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/17255