Internal user perception of service quality in a public institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/idata.v22i1.16529Keywords:
Service quality; internal user; management; corporate social responsibility; organizational climateAbstract
This is a quantitative, descriptive and comparative study conducted on a sample of 310 public servants that attempts to describe the perception of service quality of the internal user via the following factors: cooperation between internal users, leadership of management, corporate social responsibility and performance self-appraisal. This study defines the internal user as any collaborator holding a position in the organizational structure. The valid and reliable five-degree EPCSU-IP ordinal scale was used for this research. The total perception is at a neutral level (3.54) with a tendency to higher degrees; it tends to be favorable in the dimensions of cooperation between internal users (3.67) and performance self-appraisal (3.73), and unfavorable regarding the factors leadership of management (3.45) and corporate social responsibility (3.27). The variable is studied as an indicator of the organizational climate in relation to the management of production processes of goods and services.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Suseyla Roxana Sarmiento Prieto, Mildred Teresa Paredes Tarazona
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. Authors retain their trade mark rights and patent, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. Authors retain their right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article (eg, to place their article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the INDUSTRIAL DATA.
c. Authors retain theirs right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part thereof (eg a compilation of his papers, lecture notes, thesis, or a book), always indicating the source of publication (the originator of the work, journal, volume, number and date).