Internal user perception of service quality in a public institution

Authors

  • Suseyla Roxana Sarmiento Prieto Sugrafica en Inversiones Sujuro S. A. C., Lima, Peru
  • Mildred Teresa Paredes Tarazona Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima, Peru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/idata.v22i1.16529

Keywords:

Service quality; internal user; management; corporate social responsibility; organizational climate

Abstract

This is a quantitative, descriptive and comparative study conducted on a sample of 310 public servants that attempts to describe the perception of service quality of the internal user via the following factors: cooperation between internal users, leadership of management, corporate social responsibility and performance self-appraisal. This study defines the internal user as any collaborator holding a position in the organizational structure. The valid and reliable five-degree EPCSU-IP ordinal scale was used for this research. The total perception is at a neutral level (3.54) with a tendency to higher degrees; it tends to be favorable in the dimensions of cooperation between internal users (3.67) and performance self-appraisal (3.73), and unfavorable regarding the factors leadership of management (3.45) and corporate social responsibility (3.27). The variable is studied as an indicator of the organizational climate in relation to the management of production processes of goods and services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Suseyla Roxana Sarmiento Prieto, Sugrafica en Inversiones Sujuro S. A. C., Lima, Peru

    Psychologist, General manager of Sugrafica at Inversiones Sujuro S. A. C., Lima, Peru.

  • Mildred Teresa Paredes Tarazona, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima, Peru

    PhD. in Psychology, professor at the School of Psychology of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima, Peru.

Published

2019-07-31

Issue

Section

Producción y Gestión

How to Cite

Internal user perception of service quality in a public institution. (2019). Industrial Data, 22(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.15381/idata.v22i1.16529