Homology and teleosemantics: The problem of the identity of the biological trait
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/tesis.v14i19.21931Keywords:
homology, biological function, teleosemantic, tetrachromacyAbstract
Teleosemantic is the theory that proposes an explanation of mental representation on the basis of the Darwinian theory of biological function. Although Darwin explains biological traits for both historical and adaptationist causes, Papineau and other proponents of teleosemantic rely only on the adaptationist dimension of the theory to account for the identity of the biological trait. This is shown in the teleosemantic response to the possibility that an exact duplicate of a human arose from non-evolutionary causes (the swampman). Clarifying the question about the homological nature of the trait identity is central to addressing the swampman argument. This argument has been renewed in the form of an empirical counterexample: the existence of functional tetrachromacy, a condition that would constitute a real case of mental representation that is not the result of a selection process. I will argue that teleosemantics can respond to the tetrachromacy challenge on the basis of a true evolutionary conception of biological trait identity.
References
Amundson, R. (2012). Homology and homoplasy: A philosophical perspective. Wiley Online Encyclopedia of the Life Sciences.
Brooks, D. R. y McLennan, D. A. (2002). The nature of diversity. An evolutionary voyage of discovery. The University of Chicago Press.
De Pinna, M. C. (1991). Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics, 7, 367-394.
Davidson, D. (1987). Knowing one’s own mind. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 60, 441-458.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. John Murray.
Fodor, J. y Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2010). What Darwin got wrong. Farrar/Straus/ Giroux.
Garson, J. y Papineau, D. (2019). Teleosemantics, selection, and novel contents. Biology & Philosophy, 34(36). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9689-8
Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Gould, S. J. y Lewontin, R. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptation-ist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B205(1161), 581-598.
Goodwin, B. C. (1982). Development and evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 97, 43-55.
Goodwin, B. C. (1994). How the leopard changed its spots. The evolution of complexity. Princeton University
Hebert, P. D. N., Stoeckle, M., Zemlak, T. y Francis, C. (2004). Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLOS Biology, 2(10), e312. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312
Hebert, P. D. N., Hollingsworth, P. M y Hajibabaei, M. (2016). From writing to reading the encyclopedia of life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371(1702): 20150321. doi: 10.1098/ rstb.2015.0321
Ereshefsky, M. (2009). Homology: integrating phylogeny and development. Biological Theory, 4(3), 225-229.
Holmes, B. (2004). Barcode me. New Scientist, 182, 32-35.
Kekkonen, M. y Hebert, P. D. (2014,). DNA barcode-based delineation of putative species: efficient start for taxonomic workflows. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14, 706-715. doi:10.1111/1755- 0998.12233
Lee, M. (2004). The molecularisation of taxonomy. Invertebrate Systematics, 18(1), 1-6. doi: doi.org/10.1071/IS03021
Mayr, E. (1966). Animals species and evolution. Harvard University Press.
Matthen, M. (2000). What is a hand? What is a mind? Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 54(214[4]), 653-672.
Matthen, M. (2007). Defining vision: what homology thinking contributes. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 675-689.
Millikan R. (1996). On swampkinds. Mind Lang, 11(1), 103-117.
Millikan, R. (2004). The varieties of meaning. MIT Press.
Owen, R. (1843). Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the invertebrate animals, Delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons, in 1843. Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.
Owen, R. (2012 [1849]). Discurso sobre la naturaleza de las extremidades. (Sergio Balari, Trad.). KRK.
Papineau, D. (2000). Cómo evitar matar al hombre del pantano. En J. Botero, J. Ramos y Rosas, A. (Eds.), Mente reales. La ciencia cognitiva y la naturalización de la mente (pp. 81-100), Siglo del Hombre Editores.
Papineau, D. (2017). Teleosemantics. En D. L. Smith (Ed.), How biology shapes philosophy (pp. 95-120). Cambridge University Press.
Porter, B. (2020). Teleosemantics and tetrachromacy. Biology & Philosophy, 35(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9732-9
Pust, J. (2004). Natural selection and the traits of individual organisms. Biology & Philosophy, 19(5), 765-779.
Razeto-Barry, P. y Frick, R. (2011). Probabilistic causation and the explanatory role of natural selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 42(3), 344-355.
Roffé, A. J. (2020). Dynamic homology and circularity in cladistic analysis. Biology and Philosophy, 35(21). https://doi-org.ezpbibliotecas.udec.cl/10.1007/s10539-020-9737-4
Seyfarth, R., Cheney, D. y Marler, P. (1980). Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science, 210, 801-803.
Sober, E. (1984). The nature of selection. Evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. The University of Chicago Press.
Sober, E. (1995). Natural selection and distributive explanation: A reply to Neander. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46, 384-397.
Torres, J. (2014). Causalidad y evidencia en la argumentación darwiniana. TEOREMA. Revista Internacional de Filosofía. XXXIII(1), 57-66.
Torres, J. (2015). Selección natural y condicionamiento de operantes: una crítica a la analogía de Fodor y Piattelli-Palmarini. SCIENTIAE STUDIA. Revista Latino-Americana de História e Filosofia da Ciência, 13, 485-720.
Torres, J. (2020). Código de barras de ADN: Problemas conceptuales de una analogía científica. Análisis Filosófico, 40(2), 169-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.36446/af.2020.352.
Webster, G. Y Goodwin, B. (1996). Form and transformation: Generative and relational principles in biology. Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). The blue and brown books. (2.ª ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Wittgenstein, L. (1988[1953]). Investigaciones filosóficas. (Alfonso García Suárez y Ulises Moulines, Trads.). Crítica.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Julio Torres Meléndez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
(a) The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
(b) The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in Tesis (Lima) (in example, depositing the article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with recognition of its initial publication in the Tesis (Lima).
(c) The authors retain the right to make a later publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, magazine, volume, number and date).
