Eugen Fink’s Critique of Husserlean Phenomenological Language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/tesis.v14i19.21933Keywords:
phenomenology, language, Fink, Husserl, phenomenological reductionAbstract
In this article I consider Eugen Fink’s critique of Husserlean approach to language in phenomenology, first of all in the ‘middle’ and ‘late’ periods of Husserlean works since Ideas I. Fink was Husserl’s student and assistant and, also, he was influenced by Heidegger’s ideas. In his works he criticized insufficient attention and unworked position to language in Husserl’s works. He believed that language is very important to the whole theory of phenomenology, that we cannot carry out true phenomenological reduction without clarifying what language is, how it is related to our thinking, is it possible to think without language and is it possible to carry out a complete phenomenological reduction.
References
Bollnow, O. (2009). Das Wesen der Stimmungen. Königshausen & Neumann.
Fink, E. (1966). The problem of E. Husserl’s phenomenology. Fink E. Studien zur Phänomenologie. 1930-1939. Martinus Nijhoff.
Fink, E. (1995). Sixth cartesian meditation. The idea of transcendental theory of method. Indiana University Press.
Fink, E. (2022). Elemente einer Husserl-Kritik. Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 3: Phänomenologische Werkstatt. Eugen Finks Mitarbeit mit Edmund Husserl. Teilband 3.4 / R. Bruzina (Hg.). K. Alber. (In print).
Fischer, M. (1985). Differente Wissensfelder, einheitlicher Vernunftraum. Über Husserls Begriff der Einstellung. W. Fink.
Heidegger, M. (1976). Was ist metaphysik? Wegmarken. Klostermann.
Held, K. (2013). Von Pyrrhon zu Husserl: Zur Vorgeschichte der phänomenologischen Epoché. Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy, 1(2), 233-244.
Husserl, E. (1965). Philosophy and the crisis of European man. Phenomenology and the crisis of philosophy. [Quentin Lauer, Trans.]. Harper & Row.
Husserl, E. (1976). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. [Biemel Walter, Ed.]. Nijhoff. Husserliana VI.
Husserl, E. (2002). Zur phänomenologischen Reduktion: Texte aus dem Nachlass (1926-1935). [Luft Sebastian, Ed.]. Kluwer. (Husserliana XXXIV).
Luft, S. (2002). Phänomenologie der Phänomenologie: Systematik und Methodologie der Phänomenologie. Auseinandersetzung zwischen Husserl und Fink. Kluwer.
Misch, G. (1931). Lebensphilosophie und Phänomenologie. Teubner.
Overgaard, S. (2015). How to do things with brackets: The Epoché explained. Continental Philosophy Review, 48(2), 179-195.
Staiti, A. (2009). Systematische Überlegungen zu Husserls Einstellungslehre. Husserl Studies, 25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Natalia Tomashpolskaia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
(a) The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
(b) The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in Tesis (Lima) (in example, depositing the article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with recognition of its initial publication in the Tesis (Lima).
(c) The authors retain the right to make a later publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, magazine, volume, number and date).
