Philosophy of Constitutional Law: Analysis of the Resolutions of the National Council of the Judgment, Today National Board of Justice (JNJ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/tesis.v15i20.23503Keywords:
National Council of the Judiciary, Philosophy of Constitutional Law, Constitutional interpretation, National Board of Justice, Constitutional CourtAbstract
Social factors influence the evolution of Constitutional Law. However, the Philosophy of Constitutional Law, by making a rational study of the regulations, in a universal social context, proposes alternatives in the search for solutions. In this scenario, this research work is carried out, on “The Constitutional Court and the Interpretation of the Resolutions issued by the National Council of the Magistracy in matters of evaluation and ratification of magistrates” and analyzing the Resolutions of the National Council of the Magistrature, today JNJ, within a socio-legal context. In this regard, Article 142 of the 1993 Constitution, regulates that: “The resolutions of the National Elections Jury, in electoral matters, nor those of the National Council of the Magistracy in matters of evaluation and ratification of elections, are not reviewable in court. judges”. However, the Constitutional Court interpreted that the filing and declaration as founded of a claim for amparo against the CNM is feasible. In that sense and after carrying out the study of the sentences issued, on this particular, it is observed that the interpretation work carried out exceeds the limits of this Institution; constitutional reform being appropriate.
References
Aragón Reyes, M. (1987). El control como elemento inseparable del concepto de Constitución. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 19, 15-52. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=79346
García de Enterría, E. (1995). Democracia, jueces y control de la administración. Cívitas.
Garcia de Enterría, E. (2001), La Constitución como norma y el Tribunal Constitucional. Civitas Ediciones.
García Pelayo, M. (1991). El “status” del Tribunal Constitucional. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 1(1), 11-34.
García Pelayo, M. (1977). Las transformaciones del Estado contemporáneo. Alianza Editorial.
Landa Arroyo, C. R. (2005). El amparo en el nuevo Código Procesal Constitucional peruano. En J. Woischnik (ed.), Anuario de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung E. V. https://bit.ly/3z5joE1
Larenz, K. (2015). La filosofía contemporánea del derecho y del Estado. Editorial Reus.
Zelada Bartra, J. V. (2014). Disciplinas filosóficas. (2.ª ed.). Corporación Grafica Suiza.
Zelada Bartra, J. V. (2019). Filosofía del derecho constitucional. (1.ª ed.). Al-Masih, Rodenas & García.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jaime Alejandro Zelada Flores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
(a) The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
(b) The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in Tesis (Lima) (in example, depositing the article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with recognition of its initial publication in the Tesis (Lima).
(c) The authors retain the right to make a later publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, magazine, volume, number and date).
