True and false positives in HIV screening tests in three Peruvian algorithms, 2023

Authors

  • Eduardo Miranda Ulloa Instituto Nacional de Salud, Centro Nacional de Salud Pública, Laboratorio de Referencia Nacional de Virus de Transmisión Sexual. Lima, Peru https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5687-5437
  • Soledad Romero Ruiz Instituto Nacional de Salud, Centro Nacional de Salud Pública, Laboratorio de Referencia Nacional de Virus de Transmisión Sexual. Lima, Peru
  • Ronal Briceño Espinoza Instituto Nacional de Salud, Centro Nacional de Salud Pública, Laboratorio de Referencia Nacional de Virus de Transmisión Sexual. Lima, Peru
  • Dilan Suárez Agüero Instituto Nacional de Salud, Centro Nacional de Salud Pública, Laboratorio de Referencia Nacional de Virus de Transmisión Sexual. Lima, Peru
  • Edgardo Mamani Huamán Instituto Nacional de Salud, Centro Nacional de Salud Pública, Laboratorio de Referencia Nacional de Virus de Transmisión Sexual. Lima, Peru
  • Maribel Acuña Instituto Nacional de Salud, Centro Nacional de Salud Pública, Laboratorio de Referencia Nacional de Virus de Transmisión Sexual. Lima, Peru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/anales.v85i4.29009

Keywords:

HIV, Serology, Diagnostic Algorithm, Mass Screening, Peru

Abstract

There are few countries that evaluate the performance of their algorithms. Objective. Determine the proportion of true and false positives to HIV screening tests in three Peruvian algorithms, 2023. Methods. We compared the serological results of screening and confirmation of the conventional, new and a latest algorithm recommended by the WHO. Results. 4030 patients were studied; conventional algorithm, of 3027 people reactive to a screening test, 88.3% (2742/3027) were positive to the confirmatory serological test (true positives), corresponding to 11.7% (355/3027) false positives. New algorithm, of 951 people reactive to two screening tests, 92.6% (881/951) were true positives and 7.4% (70/951) false positives; The last algorithm did not present false positives (0/52) to three reactive screening tests. Conclusion. The conventional and new algorithms are reliable, but serological confirmation should be considered in the new algorithm when the Viral Load is undetectable; We recommend that where confirmatory testing is not available, samples be processed using three different methodologies.

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Section

Original Breve

How to Cite

1.
Miranda Ulloa E, Romero Ruiz S, Briceño Espinoza R, Suárez Agüero D, Mamani Huamán E, Acuña M. True and false positives in HIV screening tests in three Peruvian algorithms, 2023. An Fac med [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 31 [cited 2025 Jun. 19];85(4):448-53. Available from: https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/29009