Perception of Collaborative Methodologies in Public Works in the Provincial Municipality of Puno
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/iigeo.v26i51.23973Keywords:
BIM, PMO, Collaborative Methodologies, Municipalidad, PunoAbstract
This research seeks to determine the perception of collaborative methodologies in the Provincial Municipality of Puno to guarantee adequate public investment, where a survey was used as an instrument to measure the perception of the levels of knowledge of collaborative methodologies. Officials and public servants involved in the design, execution and supervision of works were the target audience. It was determined that all the works carried out in the 2017-2021 period present term extensions, but not all the works present additional works.
The perception of knowledge and use of collaborative software is high among civil servants and public servants involved in investment projects.
Low communication is perceived between the design, execution and supervision offices, this concurrent problem responds to the fact that all officials do not want to have more work than they already count, municipal workers rely on Municipal management instruments such as the MOF and ROF.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yvan Huaricallo Vilca
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. Authors retain their trade mark rights and patent, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. Authors retain their right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article (eg, to place their article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Rev. Inst. investig. Fac. minas metal cienc. geogr.
c. Authors retain theirs right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part thereof (eg a compilation of his papers, lecture notes, thesis, or a book), always indicating the source of publication (the originator of the work, journal, volume, number and date).