Clitics and operators in the verbal domain in Mazahua (oto-manguean)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v22i2.25191

Keywords:

clitic, operator, phrasing, prosodic, predicate

Abstract

The article presents the set of morphemes that are anchored on the nucleus. The informative and grammatical content of the clause has been distributed in prosodic phrases. The position of the morphemes that expresses grammatical functions within the verbal domain indicates whether they are enclitics or proclitics; thus, those that are located to the left of the verb are realized as operators, and those that are located to the right encode grammatical information. The article proposes that grammatical features such as polarity, modality classes, quantification types, movement forms, aspectual and temporal values are operators; clitics appear individually or in a cluster. Clitics is restricted by prosodic criteria; it presents fixed positions; it does not duplicate; it does not exhibit cumulative values; it occurs with different semantic value; only some meanings of the same group covary systematically. Clitic clusters are composed of four proclitics and four enclitics attached to the nucleus of the clause; the number of clitics is determined by the grammatical requirements generated in the grammatical context.

Author Biography

  • Armando Mora-Bustos, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, México

    D. in Linguistics from the Colegio de México (Mexico City). Member of the National System of Researchers (SIN). He is a full time professor-researcher at the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Unidad Iztapalapa (CDMX. Mexico). Describes the Mazahua and Chichimeco languages. He also analyzes different varieties of Mexican Spanish and Colombian Andean Spanish. He has published several grammatical topics in books on specific subjects and specialized magazines. Some topics have been explained under the model of Role and Reference Grammar. His interest is focused on functional typological studies, basically in syntax, morphology and pragmatics.

References

Amador Hernández, M. (1976). Gramática del Mazahua de San Antonio Pueblo Nuevo. [Tesis de licenciatura, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia]. https://mediateca.inah.gob.mx/repositorio/islandora/object/tesis%3A1940

Arellanes, F. y Romero, A. (2021). La complejidad de la epéntesis vocálica en mazahua. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México, 8, 1-68.

Bartholomew, D. A. (1965). The reconstruction of Otopamean (Mexico) [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Chicago]. https://mexico.sil.org/es/resources/archives/58082

Borise, L. (2021). Tone and Intonation in Languages of the Caucasus. En The Oxford Handbook of Languages of the Caucasus (pp. 1-32). Oxford University Press.

Croft, W. (2022). Morphosyntax: Constructions of the World’s languages. Cambridge University Press.

Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Basil Blackwell.

Dahl, Ö. (Ed.). (2000). Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology. Mouton de Gruyter.

Dixon, R. M. y Aikhenvald, A. (Eds.). (2002). Word: a cross-linguistic typology. Cambridge University Press.

Dixon, R. M. (2004). Australian languages: Their nature and development. Cambridge University Press.

DuBois, J., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Paolino, D. y Cumming, S. (1992). Discourse transcription. University of California Santa Barbara.

Fidencio, V. (2013). Construcciones transitivas y ditransitivas en el mazahua de San Pedro del Rosal [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana]. http://tesiuami.izt.uam.mx/uam/aspuam/presentatesis.php?recno=16873&docs=UAMI16873.pdf

Gerlach, B. y Grijzenhout, J. (Eds.). (2000). Clitics in phonology, morphology and syntax. John Benjamins.

Guillaume, A. (2017). Sistemas complejos de movimiento asociado en las lenguas Takana y Pano: perspectivas descriptiva, tipológica e histórico-comparativa. Amerindia, 39, 211-261.

Haspelmath, M. (2022). Types of clitics in the world’s languages. https://www.academia.edu/83478708/Types_of_clitics_in_the_worlds_languages

Himmelmann, N. (2022). Prosodic phrasing and the emergence of phrase structure. Linguistics, 60(3), 715-743.

Himmelmann, N., Sandler, M., Strunk, J. y Unterladstetter, V. (2018). On the universality of intonational phrases in spontaneous speech: A cross-linguistic interrater study. Phonology, 35, 207-245.

Jiménez Ovando, R. (s. f.). Testimonio gráfico del pueblo mazahua. México. Gobierno del Estado de México.

Juárez, C. y Cervantes, A. (2005). Temas de (morfo)fonología del mazahua de el Déposito, San Felipe del Progreso, Edo. Méx. Con un análisis instrumental [Tesis de licenciatura. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa]. http://148.206.53.231/tesiuami/UAMI12036.pdf

Knapp, M. (2008). Fonología segmental y léxica del mazahua. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

Knapp, M. (2013). Doctrina y enseñanza en la lengua mazahua. Estudio filológico y edición interlineal del texto bilingüe de Nájera Yanguas. Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas.

Koch, H. (1984). The category of ‘Associated Motion’ en Kaytej. Language in Central Australia, 1, 23-34.

Kroeger, P. (2005). Analyzing Grammar. An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational Phonology. (2.a ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Lambrecht, K. (2000). When subjects behave like objects: an analysis of the merging of S and O in Sentence-Focus Constructions across languages. Studies in Language, 24(3), 611-682.

Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press.

Madrid Servín, E. (2021). Fraseo prosódico en el español de México. Estudio de un corpus de habla espontánea. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Mora Bustos, A. (6 de noviembre de 2020). La palabra verbal en mazahua: orden de morfemas [Sesión de conferencia]. Coloquio de Investigación Lingüística, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, México.

Mora-Bustos, A. (13 de agosto 2011). Split Intransitivity in Mazahua [Sesión de conferencia]. International Conference on Role and Reference Grammar, Universidad de Santiago, Santiago de Chile, Chile.

Mora-Bustos, A. (2022). Predicados no nucleares en mazahua (otomangue). Lengua y Sociedad, 21(2), 149-176.

Mora-Bustos, A. y Fidencio, V. (14 de noviembre de 2018). Movimiento asociado y codificación del sujeto gramatical en mazahua [Sesión de conferencia]. Seminario de complejidad sintáctica, Universidad de Sonora, México.

Nespor, M. y Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Foris Publications.

Ortiz Villegas, A., Hernández, N., Mora-Bustos, A. y García Zúñiga, A. (2021). Sistema locativo en tres lenguas otomangues. Anales de Antropología, 55(2), 125-141.

Partida-Peñalva, V. (2018). Split-S in Mazahua and the obligatory little-v agreement. University of Toronto.

Payne, T. (2006). Exploring Languages Structure. Cambridge University Press.

Pike, E. (1951). Tonemic-intonemic correlation in Mazahua (Otomí). International Journal of American Linguistics, 17, 37-41.

Prieto, P. (Ed.). (2003). Teorías de la entonación. Ariel.

Schiering, R. (2006). Cliticization and the Evolution of Morphology: A Cross-linguistic Study on Phonology in Grammaticalization. Bibliothek der Universität Konstanz.

Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax. The Relation between Sound and Structure. MIT Press.

Spencer, A. y Luis, A. (2012). Clitics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Spotts, H. (1953). Vowel harmony and consonant sequences in Mazahua (Otomí). International Journal of American Linguistics, 19(4), 253-258.

Steedman, M. (2000). Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649-689.

Stewart, D. (1966). Gramática del mazahua. Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.

Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge University Press.

Van Valin, R. y LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge University Press.

Victoria Sebastián, A. (2018). La codificación del objeto y las funciones del dativo en mazahua de San Antonio de la laguna [Tesis de maestría, Centro de Investigación y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social]. http://ciesas.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1015/783

Wagner, M. (2005). Prosody and Recursion [Tesis de doctorado, Instituto Tecnológico de Massachusetts].

Watson, D. y Gibson, E. (2004). The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(6), 713-755.

Zimmerling, A. (2012). A unified analysis of clitic clusters. Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies, 11(18), 726-738.

Zwicky, A. (1977). On clitics. Indiana University Linguistic Club.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-26

Issue

Section

Academic articles

How to Cite

Mora-Bustos, A. (2023). Clitics and operators in the verbal domain in Mazahua (oto-manguean). Lengua Y Sociedad, 22(2), 303-334. https://doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v22i2.25191

Most read articles by the same author(s)