Mapping Higher Order Thinking Skills in English for Specific Purposes Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v22i2.25312Keywords:
English for Specific Purposes, Bloom’s taxonomy, Teaching English as a Foreign Language, Higher Thinking, Legal EnglishAbstract
This article displays the main foundations and findings of a research on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in legal English courses at Universidad Santo Tomás in Villavicencio (Colombia), intended to provide an answer to the following question: What is the impact of fostering Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) within legal English classes? The study was a descriptive longitudinal mixed methods approach research developed over two years with 56 law students with an age range between 21 and 23 years that delved into three issues, namely, students’ perceptions concerning legal English classes, after two years of participating in lessons designed under Bloom’s taxonomy; students’ insights regarding HOTS and their influence on learning a foreign language and on their future performance as lawyers, and the identification and analysis of strengths and weaknesses of the methodology implemented. The data collection instruments were a survey, a semi-structured interview, and the artifacts made by the students. The results suggest that students ponder on the relevance of HOTS in terms of the instruction received at the university and their future professional performance; however, they do not have a clear understanding of the features and actions correlated to analysis, evaluation, and creation. It is evident that greater exposure to learning experiences involving higher thinking is required, and its interconnection with daily life beyond the classroom.
References
Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(3), 152-153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010
Ahmed, M. K. (2014). The ESP teacher: issues, tasks and challenges. English for Specific Purposes World, 42(15), 1-33. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad_Ahmed23/publication/281345731_The_ESP_Teacher_Issues_Tasks_and_Challenges/links/55e6c60908ae1696972e17d2.pdf
Arkansas State University. (n. d.). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy action verbs. https://www.astate.edu/dotAsset/11ca93f7-da45-4fe3-821b-b82a20cbc017.pdf
Arias Rodríguez, G. L., & Roberto Flórez, E. E. (2021). The use of legal cases as a way to enhance law students’ cognitive and communicative competences in the English classes. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 7-28. https://ajal.faapi.org.ar/ojs-3.3.0-5/index.php/AJAL/article/view/100
Ashton-Hay, S. (2006) Constructivism and powerful learning environments: create your own! In 9th International English Language Teaching Convention, “The Fusion of Theory and Practice” (pp. 1-16). Middle Eastern Technical University. (Unpublished). https://eprints.qut.edu.au/17285/1/17285.pdf
Ayres, L. (2008). Semi-structured interview. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 811-812). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
Azian, A., Fauziah, I., Noor, M. I., & Norhanim, A. S. (2017). Investigating the Implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Malaysian Classrooms: Insights from L2 Teaching Practices. Sains Humanika, 9(4-2), 65-73. https://sainshumanika.utm.my/index.php/sainshumanika/article/view/1361/748
Barrantes, L. (2009). A brief view of the ESP approach. Letras (Lima), 2(46), 125-143. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5476348
Bautista, L. Z., & Parra, I. J. (2016). EFL students’ perceptions of social issues in famous works of art. HOW, 23(1), 85-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.19183/how.23.1.117
Belcher, D. (2006). English for Specific Purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264514
Bloom, B., Engelhart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: cognitive domain. David McKay.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD Alexandria.
Caruana, E. J., Roman, M., Hernández-Sánchez, J., & Solli, P. (2015). Longitudinal studies. Journal of thoracic disease, 7(11), 537-540. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.63
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. SAGE.
Cordoba, J., & Cárdenas, F. (2016). The case method in English as a foreign language in the classroom. Pinnacle Educational Research & Development, 4(2), 1-14. https://pjpub.org/perd/perd_234.pdf
Chen, M. (2016). Theoretical framework for integrating higher-order thinking into L2 speaking. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 217-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0602.01
Chen, M. (2017). Integrating thinking into L2 learning: What do we learn from students’ learning experience. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(7), 512-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0707.03
Chinedu, C., Olabiyi, O., & Kamin, Y. (2015). Strategies for improving higher order thinking skills in teaching and learning of design and technology education. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 7(2), 35-43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321059251_Strategies_for_Improving_Higher_Order_Thinking_Skills_in_Teaching_and_Learning_of_Design_And_Technology_Education
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
Dee Fink, L. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences. An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: a multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
Esteban, M., Márquez, A., & Ortiz, J. (2018). Enhancing critical thinking skills through political cartoons: A pedagogical implementation. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 16, 141-163. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1184915.pdf
Fandiño, Y. J. (2013). 21st-Century Skills and the English Foreign Language Classroom: A Call for More Awareness in Colombia. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, (7), 190-208. https://latinjournal.org/index.php/gist/article/view/622
Ferrando, E. (2023). La motivación en la enseñanza de segundas lenguas: aproximación teórico-práctica en el ámbito del enfoque integrado AICLE. Lengua y Sociedad, 22(1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v22i1.23650
Fúquen Martínez, A. Y., & Jiménez Niño, P. K. (2013). Implementing tasks that stimulate critical thinking in EFL classrooms. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica, (21), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.19053/0121053X.1955
Glaser, B., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2), 1-22.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
Kift, S., Israel, M., & Field, R. (2010). Bachelor of Laws Learning and Teaching Academic Standards Statement. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. https://cald.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/KiftetalLTASStandardsStatement2010.pdf
Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://www.depauw.edu/files/resources/krathwohl.pdf
Halliday, M. A. K., Mcintosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. Longman.
Irvine, J. (2021). Taxonomies in Education: Overview, comparison, and future directions. Journal of Education and Development, 5(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v5i2.898
James, N. (2012). Logical, critical and creative: teaching ‘thinking skills’ to law students. QUT Law & Justice, 12(1), 66-88. https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v12i1.230
Johansson, E. (2020). The assessment of higher-order thinking skills in online EFL courses: A quantitative content analysis. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 19(1), 1-23.
Köksal, D., & Ulum, Ö. G. (2018). Language assessment through Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 76-88. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jlls/issue/43364/527924
Le, L. P. (2021). Teaching ESP in the 21st century. In M. K. Kabilan., R. Aziz., & J. Netto-Shek (Eds.), Teaching and learning of English in the 21st century. Perspectives and practices from South East Asia (pp. 281-306). Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Manzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.
Nichols, C. B., & Kuswandono, P. (2020). Teachers’ strategies to implement higher-order thinking skills in English instruction. Metathesis: Journal Of English Language Literature And Teaching, 4(1), 25-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v4i1
Norum, K. (2008). Artifacts. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 23-25). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
Nourdad, N., Masoudi, S., & Rahimali, P. (2018). The effect of higher order thinking skill instruction on EFL reading ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7(3), 231-237. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.231
Othman, N., & Mohamad, K. A. (2014). Thinking skill education and transformational progress in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 7(4), 27-28. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n4p27
Pineda Báez, C. (2004). Critical thinking in the EFL classroom: the search for a pedagogical alternative to improve English learning. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 9(15), 45-80. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=255025901003
Porto, M., & Byram, M. (2015). Developing intercultural citizenship education in the language classroom and beyond. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(AJAL), 9-29. https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.9745/pr.9745.pdf
Roell, C. (2019). Using a case study in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 57(4), 24-33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1236098.pdf
Salem, A. A. M. S. (2018). Engaging ESP university students in flipped classrooms for developing functional writing skills, HOTs, and eliminating writer’s block. English Language Teaching, 11(12), 177-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n12p177
Sandoval, V., & Anturi, C. (2020). Promoting critical thinking through debates about the internal conflict in Colombia in the EFL classroom with 9th graders [Bachelor’s thesis, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas]. https://repository.udistrital.edu.co/handle/11349/23363
Snyder, L. G., & Snyder, M. J. (2008). Teaching Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 50(2), 90-99. https://dme.childrenshospital.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Optional-_Teaching-Critical-Thinking-and-Problem-Solving-Skills.pdf
Thomas, A., & Thorne, G. (2009). How to increase higher-order thinking. Centre for Development and Learning.
Tuzlukova, V., & Usha-Prabhukanth, K. (2018). Critical thinking and problem-solving skills: English for science foundation program students’ perspectives. Collection of papers of the faculty of philosophy, 48(3), 37-60. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-3293/2018/0354-32931803037T.pdf
Tyas, H., & Naibaho, L. (2021). HOTS learning model improves the quality of education. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(1), 176-182. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i1.2021.3100
Universidad Santo Tomás. (December 3, 2014). Políticas de adquisición de lengua extranjera. Acuerdo 46. https://secretariageneral.usta.edu.co/images/documentos/2014/Acuerdo-46-de-2014-Reforma-Politica-Lengua-Extranjera.pdf
Universidad Santo Tomás. (2010). Modelo pedagógico educativo. Departamento de Publicaciones Universidad Santo Tomás.
Vanicheva, T., Kah, M., & Ponidelko, L. (2015). Critical Thinking within the Current Framework of ESP Curriculum in Technical Universities of Russia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199(3), 657-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.595
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Yu, X., & Xiao, Y. (2013). A Course Design Guideline for legal English Teaching in Chinese Tertiary Education: From the Perspective of Content-based Instruction. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(7), 1123-1128. 10.4304/tpls.3.7.1123-1128
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yomaira Angélica Herreño-Contreras
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS
a. Authors retain their trade mark rights and patent, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. Authors can submit to the journal Lengua y Sociedad, papers disseminated as pre-print in repositories. This should be made known in the cover letter.
c. Authors retain their right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article (eg, to place their article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the journal Lengua y Sociedad.
d. Authors retain theirs right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part thereof (eg a compilation of his papers, lecture notes, thesis, or a book), always indicating its initial publication in the journal Lengua y Sociedad (the originator of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
