Stereotypes and discursive paradigms in the representations of the indigenous by Amauta’s socialist indigenism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/escrypensam.v22i46.24689Keywords:
Amauta, indigenism, socialism, stereotypes, discursive paradigmsAbstract
Amauta was one of the most important magazines in the Peruvian intellectual segment during the period in which it circulated from 1926 to 1930, placing the indigenous as one of the central themes. From the fundamentals of Content Analysis, we intend to map the indigenist discourse in Amauta in its first nine issues a period that corresponds to the gravitational phase of indigenism around socialism in its pages. We will show that in the representations of the indigenous in Amauta’s indigenist texts there was a stereotype that pointed to an expectation of “racial war”, resulting from discursive paradigms present in Peruvian indigenism. We will conclude, through the concepts of Reinhart Koselleck, that the representations of the indigenous in Amauta, pointed to a political perspective that shaped a discourse that in this indigenous claim for the autochthonous, so that it would be convenient with the junction of the ideal of “Andean Utopia” to the socialist expectation.
References
Bardin, L. (2002). Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70.
Beigel, F. (2015). Mariátegui y las antinomias del indigenismo. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 6(13), 36-57. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=27901303
Chartier, R. (1990). A história cultural; entre práticas e representações. Difel.
Contreras, C. y Cueto, M. (2007). Historia del Perú contemporáneo. IEP.
Flores Galindo, A (1994). Buscando un Inca: Identidad y Utopía en los Andes. Editorial Horizonte.
Grupo Resurgimiento (1927). La violenta situación de los indios en el departamento del Cusco. Amauta, (6), 37-38.
Ibarra, H. (2002). Gamonalismo y dominación en los Andes. Íconos, (14), 137-147.
Koselleck, R. (2006) Futuro Passado: Contribuição à semântica dos tempos históricos. Contraponto.
López Albújar, E. (1926). Sobre la psicología del indio. Amauta, (4), 1-2.
Mariátegui, J. C. (1926). Presentación de “Amauta”. Amauta, (l), 3.
Mariátegui, J. C. (1927a). La nueva cruzada Pró-Indígena. Amauta, (5), 37.
Mariátegui, J. C. (1927b). Replica a Luis Alberto Sánchez, Amauta, (7), 38-39.
Mayer de Zulen, D. (1926) La idea del castigo. Amauta, (3), 35-36.
Montoya Uriarte, U. (1998). Hispanismo e indigenismo: o dualismo cultural no pensamento social peruano (1900-1930). Uma revisão necessária. Revista de Antropologia, 41(1), 151-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-77011998000100005
Valcárcel, L. E. (1926). Tempestad en los Andes. Amauta, (1), 4-6.
Valcárcel, L. E. (1927). El problema indígena. Amauta, (7), 2-4.
Zapata, J. (1927). Delegados indígenas atropellados. Amauta, (6), 39-40.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bruno Batista Bolfarini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also over any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Escritura y Pensamiento (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish as part a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication by Escritura y Pensamiento.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, lecture notes, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
