Diversity and differences: linguistic ideologies as an active agent in the construction of identities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/escrypensam.v23i49.26709Keywords:
ideologies, identities, construct, language, raceAbstract
The notion of linguistic ideologies responds to a construct that favors the political and economic interests of power groups used to structure and order society. In Lima this has been structured following the canons that benefit only a sector of the population and that in turn helps the construction of identities that reflect the existing gaps in our country. Therefore, we wish to crystallize these identity extremes using semiotic processes (Gal and Irvin, 1995) with data collected from social networks with greater reach that, on the one hand, shows a discourse of inclusion, making it clear that they do not share stigmas associated with the ethnicity of the subjects and, on the other hand, clarifies the racism that still maintains our society wrapped in academic airs.
References
Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7 (4-5), 585- 614.
Chafe, W. L. (1982). Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.). Spoken and Written Language:Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Duranti, A. (2003). Language as Culture in U.S. Anthropology; Three Paradigms. Current Anthropology, 44 (3), 323-347.
Flores, N. & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 85 (2), 149-171.
Gal, S. & Irvin, J. (1995). The Boundaries of Languages and Disciplines: How Ideologies Construct Difference. Social Research, 62(4), 967-1001.
Gee, J. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York & London: Routledge.
Gee, J. (2015). Discourse, Small-D, Big D. K. Tracy, Cornelia Ilie & Todd Sandel (Eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Heller, M. & Martin-Jones, M. (2001). Introduction: Symbolic domination, education and linguistic difference. In M. Heller & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.). Voices of Authority. Education and linguistic differences. USA: Ablex Publishing.
Kroskrity, P. (2004). Language ideologies. In A. Duranti (Ed.). A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Morales et al. (2005). Regionalización y descentralización. Lima: Fondo Editorial del Colegio de Economistas de Lima.
Ong, W. (1987). Algunas de las psicodinámicas de la oralidad. La palabra articulada como poder y acción. En W. Ong. Oralidad y escritura. Tecnologías de la palabra. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Ong, W. (1987). La escritura reestructura la conciencia: el nuevo mundo del discurso autónomo. En W. Ong. Oralidad y escritura. Tecnologías de la palabra. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Tannen, D. (1982). The Oral/Literate Continuum in Discourse. In D. Tannen (Eds.). Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. New Jersey & Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
Zavala, V. & Almeida, C. (2022). “Motoso y terruco”: ideologías lingüísticas y racialización en la política peruana. Lexis, XLVI (2), 481-521.
Zavala, V. & Córdova, G. (2010). El motoseo y la racialización del estudiante bilingüe. En V. Zavala & G. Córdova (Eds.). Decir y callar: Lenguaje, equidad y poder en la universidad peruana. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Faustina Cáceres de la Cruz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also over any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Escritura y Pensamiento (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish as part a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication by Escritura y Pensamiento.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, lecture notes, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
