Reflections on Method and Theory in Microhistory, Ethnohistory and Colonial Andean History
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/is.v15i27.7681Keywords:
Methodology of history, Andean ethnohistory and colonial history, anthropological history, methods in microhistory.Abstract
I attempt here a revision about some methodological problems and research strategies with reference to some of my recent work (2010, 2009a y 2009b, 2008) in intertwined fields of ethnohistory, social history and microhistory. The general chosen procedure to facing challenging and complex documentation, was to use simultaneously various methodologies provided by modern historiography and anthropology. So, we use for example the so-called thick description (Geertz) and the ethnography of history (Sahlins) —with few o almost no use in Andean studies tradition— along with the more «normal» hermeneutic documental procedures and also the indiciary deduction of the microhistory of C. Ginzburg. The main proposal is that adequately tempered combination of these methodologies will permite us to improve the comprehensive analysis of arduous analytical problems posed by the so called indigenous colonial transformation in both spheres of historical practices and the transformation of culture and indigenous world of representations.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Luis Arana Bustamante
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. Authors retain their trade mark rights and patent, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. Authors retain their right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article (eg, to place their article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Investigaciones Sociales.
c. Authors retain theirs right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part thereof (eg a compilation of his papers, lecture notes, thesis, or a book), always indicating the source of publication (the originator of the work, journal, volume, number and date).