Reforma Agraria y productividad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/is.v11i19.8061Keywords:
Agriculturc. coopcrativism, agrarran reforrn, largc cstatc, srnallholding, Peru.Abstract
This paper argues that the underlying model ofmost development scholars 10 address the problem ofrural poverty is inappropriate. The reason is seen in the fact (11mthe changes in the production system ofa hacienda-dominated to a capitalist agriculture are not cetcris paribus but rather deteriorare from the perspective offarmers dile lo the high transaction costs, higher prices ofinputs. the farmers ' insufficient knowledge and educatiou. the /I).\'.') oI distrtbution networkss. and the denied access ro credits. Thercfore. tlie implcnientation ofa land reforni breaking up the hacienda svstem ami instulling a sector of minifundistas does not lead romore output, higher productivitv, more occupation and higher incomes for the poor in the agrarian sector.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Sven Schaller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. Authors retain their trade mark rights and patent, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. Authors retain their right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article (eg, to place their article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Investigaciones Sociales.
c. Authors retain theirs right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part thereof (eg a compilation of his papers, lecture notes, thesis, or a book), always indicating the source of publication (the originator of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
