Perception of children on violence and urban insecurity and the probability of being victims. Lima Metropolitan and Callao case

Authors

  • Juan León Mendoza Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/pc.v21i2.13262

Keywords:

Urban insecurity, urban violence, children violence, robberies and assaults

Abstract

This article aims essentially to understand and quantify the degree of victimization and the perception of violence and urban insecurity of children in Metropolitan Lima and Callao. In order to do this we took a survey to 364 children aged between 8-12 years old.

According to survey results, children perceive theft and assault in the street as the most important problem. The rate of victimization in children related to thefts and robberies on the than in school (22,3%) or streets (12,6%).

77% of respondents feel insecure or unsafe on the streets outside their neighborhood. Their confidence in the institutions responsible for urban safety is low: About 60% have little or no trust in the police, and even worse in watchmen (78%).

Children believe that the main factor of why people engage in robbery and assault is that they do not like to work and they want easy carrying.

Our logit econometric regression model indicates that the probability of children suffering some theft or assault in the street is higher as long as they belong to a dysfunctional home and have little or no trust in their parents.

Author Biography

  • Juan León Mendoza, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.
    Docente principal e investigador asociado al Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-31

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Perception of children on violence and urban insecurity and the probability of being victims. Lima Metropolitan and Callao case. (2017). Pensamiento Crítico, 21(2), 105-126. https://doi.org/10.15381/pc.v21i2.13262