Disaster Risk Management in Shelter in RIMAC district

Authors

  • Eric Espinoza Campos Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Lima, Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/pc.v24i1.16558

Keywords:

Shelter; disaster; spaces; supplies; life quality; Sphere Project

Abstract

In 2016, the MDR approve Rehabilitation Plan for Disaster Risk in Rimac district. -In 2016, there is a fire in the community of Cantagallo in the district of Rimac. 300 families of the Shipibo-Coniba community are affected, who receive the support from the Municipality of Rimac and the Metropolitan Municipality of Lima. -The Disaster Risk Management employees in Rimac district spend five years to elaborate a rehabilitation plan. This harmful event happened in a three-month short-time. -The post-disaster stage in this case has shown the difficulty of helping a number of citizen in the district of RIMAC. The issue is the location of public spaces to relocate people, because it has had to occupy a space in the so-called MARTINETI field in the district of Cercado de Lima that is to find a solution in another district. This is only part of the problem. The coordination of the officials of a district municipality with the metropolitan municipality of Lima is a serious factor. A help factor is that those affected are from a cultural community, this factor has facilitated understanding between the authorities and the affected population. -The current situation for shelter areas requires a real management for qualified professionals.

Author Biography

  • Eric Espinoza Campos, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Lima, Perú

    Ingeniero Industrial, Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Lima, Perú. Egresado de Maestría de Gestión Económica de Riesgo de Desastres y Desarrollo Sostenible Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos en Lima, Perú.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-31

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Disaster Risk Management in Shelter in RIMAC district. (2019). Pensamiento Crítico, 24(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.15381/pc.v24i1.16558