Relative clause sentence comprehension by rioplatense spanish-speaking children aged 6-11 years

Authors

  • Dolores Zamora Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Neuropsicología y Lenguaje - Instituto de Neurociencia Cognitiva y Traslacional (INCyT) / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2073-416X
  • Juan-Pablo Barreyro Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación en Psicología Matemática y Experimental (CIIPME) / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1606-1049
  • María-Victoria Sánchez Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Neuropsicología y Lenguaje - Instituto de Neurociencia Cognitiva y Traslacional (INCyT) / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Macarena Martínez-Cuitiño Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Neuropsicología y Lenguaje - Instituto de Neurociencia Cognitiva y Traslacional (INCyT) / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4912-1626

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v22i2.23934

Keywords:

sentence comprehension, relative clauses, children, syntax acquisition

Abstract

Relative clause comprehension has been the object of numerous investigations in children, but few have been able to establish the stage in which it is acquired, and research in Spanish is scarce. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of Rioplatense Spanish-speaking children in the comprehension of relative clauses. For that purpose, a total of 105 children from three age groups: 6-7, 8-9, and 10-11 years old, respectively, were assessed with an oral comprehension task of subject and object relative clauses. Results show significant differences in the performance of each group. Children of all ages have difficulty understanding object relative clauses, while performance in subject relative clauses depends on the position of the subordinate clause.

Author Biographies

  • Dolores Zamora, Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Neuropsicología y Lenguaje - Instituto de Neurociencia Cognitiva y Traslacional (INCyT) / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Professor and Bachelor of Arts from the University of Buenos Aires, specialized in Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics. Currently, she is a doctoral fellow of the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET). Her research topic focuses on the relationship between sentence comprehension and verbal working memory in elementary school children. Since 2014, she is part of the Neuropsychology and Language Research Laboratory of the INECO Foundation. She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses at Universidad Favaloro and Universidad de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires.

  • Juan-Pablo Barreyro, Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación en Psicología Matemática y Experimental (CIIPME) / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    D. in Psychology from the University of Buenos Aires, specializing in processes and skills related to text comprehension, working memory and attentional abilities. He holds a degree in Psychology from the School of Psychology of the University of Buenos Aires and is a Specialist in Statistics for Health Sciences from the School of Exact and Natural Sciences of the University of Buenos Aires. Currently, he is an independent researcher at the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET). He has been the director of UBACyT research projects since 2010.

  • María-Victoria Sánchez, Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Neuropsicología y Lenguaje - Instituto de Neurociencia Cognitiva y Traslacional (INCyT) / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Professor and Bachelor of Arts at the Universidad Católica Argentina. She is a doctoral fellow of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, and is currently researching syntactic impairment in Spanish-speaking patients with primary progressive aphasia. She is an assistant professor of Spanish Grammar I and II, and General Linguistics I and II at the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters of the Universidad Católica Argentina. Since 2020, she is part of the Neuropsychology and Language Research Laboratory of the INECO Foundation.

  • Macarena Martínez-Cuitiño, Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Neuropsicología y Lenguaje - Instituto de Neurociencia Cognitiva y Traslacional (INCyT) / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Speech therapist graduated from the School of Medical Sciences of the University of Buenos Aires. Specialist in Clinical Neuropsychology (UBA). Doctor of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the UBA. Currently, she is an adjunct researcher at the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET). She is a professor of Basic Processes I and Basic Processes II at the Faculty of Human and Behavioral Sciences of the Universidad Favaloro and Head of Practical Works of Neurophysiology I at the Faculty of Psychology (UBA). She is currently the director of the Neuropsychology and Language Research Laboratory at INECO Foundation.

References

Adani, F. (2011). Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: Towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language, 38(1), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990250

Arosio, F., Panzeri, F., Molteni, B., Magazù, S. y Guasti, M. (2017). The comprehension of Italian relative clauses in poor readers and in children with Specific Language Impairment. Glossa, 2(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.107

Bever, T. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. En M. Sanz, I. Laka, y M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Language Down the Garden Path: The Cognitive and Biological Basis for Linguistic Structures (pp. 1-80). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677139.003.0001

Bishop, D., Snowling, M., Thompson, P., Greenhalgh, T., Adams, C., Archibald, L., Baird, G., Bauer, A., Bellair, J., Boyle, C., Brownlie, E., Carter, G., Clark, B., Clegg, J., Cohen, N., Conti-Ramsden, G., Dockrell, J., Dunn, J., Ebbels, S.,… Whitehouse, A. (2017). Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 58(10), 1068-1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCPP.12721

Brucart, J. (1999). La estructura del sintagma nominal: Las oraciones de relativo. En I. Bosque y V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática Descriptiva Lengua Española (pp. 395-522). Espasa.

Corrêa, L. (1995). An alternative assessment of children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(3), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02145355

Del Río, D., López-Higes, R. y Martín-Aragoneses, M. (2012). Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: The case of Spanish subject- and object-relative clauses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(11), 2108-2128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.674951

Diessel, H. y Tomasello, M. (2001). The Development of Relative Clauses in Spontaneous Child Speech. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1-2), 131-151. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.006

Dotti, H. M., Corrêa, L., Rivera, G., Benassi, J. y Formichelli, M. (2018). Una evaluación de la comprensión de estructuras sintácticas con alto costo de procesamiento en niños en edad escolar. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 10(2), 37-57. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/racc/article/view/19772/pdf

Friedmann, N. y Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language, 31(3), 661-681. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006269

Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. En A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, y W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium (pp. 94-126). The MIT Press.

Guasti, M. (2002). Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar. MIT Press.

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. (6.ª ed.). McGraw Hill.

Injoque-Ricle, I., Barreyro, J. y Burin, D. (2012). Estructura de la memoria operativa: comparando diferentes modelos en la infancia. Escritos de Psicología (Internet), 5(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v5i2.13298

Jackendoff, R. (1987). The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(3), 369-411. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178548

Kidd, E. y Bavin, E. (2002). English-speaking children’s comprehension of relative clauses: Evidence for general-cognitive and language-specific constraints on development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(6), 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021265021141

Leonard, L. (1998). Children with Specific Language Impairment. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9152.003.0006

Manoiloff, L., Requena, P., Carando, M., Defagó, C., Alemany, L., Cesaretti, D., Ferrero, C., Ramírez, A. y Segui, J. (2018). Factors that influence the comprehension of Spanish relative clauses: Exploratory study. Onomazein, 5(42), 23-52. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.42.01

Martín-Loeches, M. (2012). Sintaxis. En F. Cuetos (Ed.), Neurociencia del Lenguaje. Bases neurológicas e implicaciones clínicas (pp. 77-92). Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Mendoza, E., Carballo, G., Muñoz, J. y Fresneda, M. (2005). CEG. Test de Comprensión de Estructuras Gramaticales. TEA Ediciones.

Moreno Cabrera, J. (2021). Origen y evolución de la sintaxis compleja. Lengua y Sociedad. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 20(2), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v20i2.22186

Murujosa, M. y Sevilla, Y. (2022). La asimetría sujeto/objeto en la comprensión de cláusulas de relativo en español: un recorrido empírico y teórico. Lingüística, 38(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.5935/2079-312x.20220004

Rakhlin, N., Kornilov, S., Kornilova, T. y Grigorenko, E. (2016). Syntactic complexity effects of Russian relative clause sentences in children with and without developmental language disorder. Language Acquisition, 23(4), 333-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2016.1179312

Rusli, Y. y Montgomery, J. (2017). Children’s comprehension of object relative sentences: It’s extant language knowledge that matters, not domain-general working memory. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(10), 2865-2878. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0422

Sánchez, M., Taboh, A., Fuchs, M., Barreyro, J. y Jaichenco, V. (2017). Comprensión de oraciones con cláusulas relativas. Un estudio comparativo entre sujetos con y sin alteraciones del lenguaje. Cuadernos de Neuropsicología/Panamerican Journal of Neuropsychology, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.7714/CNPS/11.3.211

Sautu, R. (2005). Todo es teoría. Objetivos y métodos de investigación. Ediciones Lumiere.

Serra, M., Serrat, E., Solé, R., Bel, A. y Melina, A. (2003). La adquisición del lenguaje. Ariel S. A.

Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(3), 272-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80064-2

Stavrakaki, S. (2001). Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in specifically language impaired and normally developing Greek children. Brain and Language, 77(3), 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2412

van der Lely, H. y Battell, J. (2003). WH-Movement in Children with Grammatical SLI: A Test of the RDDR Hypothesis. Language, 79(1), 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0089

Downloads

Published

2023-09-26

Issue

Section

Academic articles

How to Cite

Zamora, D., Barreyro, J.-P., Sánchez, M.-V., & Martínez-Cuitiño, M. (2023). Relative clause sentence comprehension by rioplatense spanish-speaking children aged 6-11 years. Lengua Y Sociedad, 22(2), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v22i2.23934