SITUACIÓN DE LA PARASITOSIS HEPATOINTESTINAL HUMANA EN EL PERÚ MEDIANTE COPROMICROSCOPIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/os.v1i5.3795Keywords:
Human, nematodes, cestodes, Fasciola, protozoa, prevalence.Abstract
In an analitic study of the Parasitology and microbiology and the Peruvian Parasitology congresses and many national publications about, of the last 25 years, it has been abstracted prevalence ciphers of the parasitic diseases in the human intestinal-hepatic segment, that had been taken using the microscopic-fecal test. Using this test, we could obtain 31306 samples, principally of students from: the urban, suburb and rural areas, in almost all over the country. It could be found the following average ciphers: 27.4% (with limits between 0.5-95.0) for nematodes (Ascaris, Trichuris, Uncinarias: Necator orancylostoina, Strongyloides, Enterobius); 6.1% (with limits between 0.2-50.0) for cestodes (Taenia, Hymenolepis, Diphyllobothrium); 6.8% (with limits between 0.3-17.9) for Fasciola; and 17.4% (with limits between 0.3-58.1) forprotozoa (Entamoeba, Giardia, Endolimax, Balantidium, Chilomastix, Iodamoeba, Blastocystis, Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora). With this registered information, we conclude to propose the necesity of improve prevention and control programs for this parasites.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2000 Hilda Moromi N., Marcelo Rojas C.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. Authors retain their trade mark rights and patent, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. Authors retain their right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article (eg, to place their article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Odontología Sanmarquina.
c. Authors retain theirs right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part thereof (eg a compilation of his papers, lecture notes, thesis, or a book), always indicating the source of publication (the originator of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
