Seeking quality in a scientific article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/rpb.v18i2.251Abstract
The quality of scientific journal papers has been directly or indirectly sumitted to trials, reviews, analysis, meta-analysis, theories and other analyzes. However, the quality in practice it remains a problem, because not unknown how to do it, but the strong pressure of researchers, who use scientific publication as a justification for their activity. This situation would remain and in some cases strengthened in a scenario where institutions have a strong preference for a voluminous curriculum face substantial seminal papers.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Leonardo Romero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. Authors retain their trade mark rights and patent, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. Authors retain their right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article (eg, to place their article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Revista Peruana de Biologia.
c. Authors retain theirs right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part thereof (eg a compilation of his papers, lecture notes, thesis, or a book), always indicating its initial publication in the Revista Peruana de Biologia (the originator of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
