Great mining and poverty from the poor: Las Bambas, Apurimac

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/pc.v25i1.16621

Keywords:

Subjective poverty, abilities, well-being and mining

Abstract

The investigation had three objectives; The first was to identify the variables that affect the self-perception of poverty of the residents of the Challhuahuacho district; then analyze the relationship of the displaced population and their self-perception of poverty; The third objective was to explore the possible contribution of the Las Bambas mining project to the subjective well-being of the local population. The research design was non-experimental and cross-sectional, descriptive correlational type. The study population was the heads of household, with a sample of three hundred and fifty, selected by simple probabilistic sampling. To collect the information, a questionnaire referring to personal information, the environment and the level of satisfaction in various domains of life was applied. The results obtained for the first objective show that the variables: education, displacement, health satisfaction, job satisfaction, satisfaction with family income and satisfaction in maintaining dependents adequately; significantly affect the subjective poverty of the residents of Challhuahuacho. Regarding the second objective, it is evident that there is a significant inverse relationship between subjective poverty and the condition of being displaced. Finally, according to the results, the Las Bambas mining project contributes little to subjective well-being.

JEL: I31, I32, I38.

Author Biography

  • Alipio Orco Diaz, Universidad Nacional Micaela Bastidas de Apurímac

    Economista, UIGV, Lima Perú. Maestría en Gerencia Social, UAP, Lima Perú. Egresado del Doctorado Gestión Económica Global, UNMSM, Lima Perú. Profesor Principal de la Universidad Nacional Micaela Bastidas de Apurímac.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-18

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Great mining and poverty from the poor: Las Bambas, Apurimac. (2020). Pensamiento Crítico, 25(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.15381/pc.v25i1.16621