Metodología de evaluación ex post
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/pc.v13i0.9001Keywords:
Evaluation, efficiency, productivity, goals, impact.Abstract
This article provides a synthesis of ex post evaluation methodology used by the author in the evaluation of the Second Social Investment Program Infrastructure and Poverty (hereinafter the Program), executed by the MEF, with financial support from the Corporación Andina de Fomento (CAF). The aim of this action was to assess the levels of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability of public investment projects making up the program. To this end, the methodological framework adopted took into consideration that the object of an evaluation is to determine if the projects generate the desired effects on individuals and institutions which are run in accordance with the guidelines established in the pre-investment documents and appraisal approved by the official agencies. In general, the methodology used in this evaluation is oriented to draw valid conclusions about the performance of projects with regard to the criteria of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and impact. This methodology may be replicated in similar situations, that is why this brief summary is provided.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 David Medianero Burga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in Pensamiento Crítico (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with recognition of its initial publication in Pensamiento Crítico.
c. The authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
