In vitro comparison of the apical seal between two thermoplastic filling systems: Guttacore and E&Q Master
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/os.v21i3.15153Keywords:
EDTA, Gutta-Percha, Microfiltration, Sodium HypochloriteAbstract
Objective: Compare in vitro the apical seal of thermoplastic filling systems, GuttaCore® and E&Q Master®, from the perspective of microfiltration. Methods: Forty single-rooted teeth were instrumented with rotary system and irrigated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. The samples were divided into two groups (20 for each system); sealed and placed in the incubator at 37°C and 100% humidity for 3 days. Each sample was covered with colored varnish except the last 3 apical millimiters to be immersed in 2% methylene blue for 3 days and centrifuged for 20 min at 3000 rpm. The samples were washed and fractured axially for their analysis in the stereomicroscope by means of photographs. For the data analysis we used the t Student test with a level of significance of 5%. Results: The mean microfiltration values were 0.660 mm and 0.825 mm for GuttaCore and E&Q Master respectively, no statistically significant differences were found between them (p=0.525). Conclusion: GuttaCore and E&Q Master are seal systems that offer good apical sealing, there is no difference between them.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Viviana Marcela Hidalgo Moya, Isadora Martini Garcia, Paola Andrea Mena Silva, Raquel Esmeralda Guillén Guillén
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. Authors retain their trade mark rights and patent, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. Authors retain their right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article (eg, to place their article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Odontología Sanmarquina.
c. Authors retain theirs right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part thereof (eg a compilation of his papers, lecture notes, thesis, or a book), always indicating the source of publication (the originator of the work, journal, volume, number and date).