Differences in analogical reasoning and oral language processes in bilingual primary students: quechua-castilian, shipibo-castilian and spanish speakers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v21i2.15820Keywords:
Bilingualism, oral language, intelligenceAbstract
The objective of the present investigation was to establish whether there are differences in analogical reasoning and oral language processes in children from schools with education in Spanish with the influence of native languages versus Spanish speakers. 24 Socos students were evaluated; 30 from Huamanga, 30 from the Shipiba community and 30 Spanish speakers from Pachacútec. Significant differences were found in aspects such as phoneme discrimination, articulatory phonology, verbal memory, composition of sentences, description of actions, vocabulary, non-verbal intelligence, in favor of Pachacútec-Ventanilla students (those with the least linguistic interference), followed by students from Huamanga-Ayacucho; being the students of the rural community of Socos-Ayacucho. The same happened when the performance in non-verbal intelligence was compared. It is confirmed that exposing speakers of native languages to an education in Spanish it does not allow to properly construct its psycholinguistic structure or its analogical thinking.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Esther Velarde Consoli, Ricardo Canales Gabriel, Carmen Magali Meléndez Jara, Katherine Susana Lingán Huamán
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Journal of Research in Psychology (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Journal of Research in Psychology.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, lecture notes, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source. of publication (authors of the work, magazine, volume, number and date).
