Relationship between family types and moral judgment level in university students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v13i2.3723Keywords:
family types, moral judgement, tenth semester psychology students, clinical psychology majorAbstract
Objectives: a. To know the relationship between family types and the moral judgement level of tenth semester Clinical Psychology college students at UNMSM. b. Identify the family types of tenth semester Clinical Psychology college students at UNMSM. c. Identify the moral judgement level of tenth semester Clinical Psychology college students at UNMSM. d. To determine the relationship between the family type and the pr.conventional moral judgement level of tenth semester Clinical Psychology college students at UNMSM. e. To determine the relationship between the family type and the conventional moral judgement level of tenth semester Clinical Psychology college students at UNMSM. Design: Correlational study. Materials and methods: The participants were 55 tenth semester Clinical Psychology college students at UNMSM. It was used the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES III) and Gibbs and Widam’s Sociomoral Reflection Objective Measure (SROM). Results: 51 percent of college students are at the conventional moral judgement level. The chaoti.dipersed family type is the most frequent (12) and represents the 22% of the sample. Considering the family operating level, the "middle range" is the most frequent and represents the 51% of participants. Conclusions: The family operating level most frequent is the "middle range" type. Also, the predominant moral judgement is the conventional one. It was found a significative statistical relationship among, family operating "middle range" level and conventional moral judgement level.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Ana Delgado V., Enrique Ricapa Z.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Journal of Research in Psychology (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Journal of Research in Psychology.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, lecture notes, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source. of publication (authors of the work, magazine, volume, number and date).
