Mental models of university quality in San Marcos students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v9i2.4022Keywords:
mental model, representacin, abstraction, academic areas, university qualityAbstract
Investigation takes as reference the contributions from Cognitiva Psychologist on mental models, in the proposals of Johnson-Laird (1996), Moreira (1997) and Vergnaud (1996), as well as construction cognitive of the concept of university quality in its different dimensions and proposals. The investigation is exploratory, descriptive and comparative. The objectives of investigation are the following ones: 1. Identify and to characterize the mental models developed by the university students, 2. Determine the characteristics and attributes and to compare them in the five academics areas who organize the studies in Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. We have developed the analysis method of content, based in connotative meanings of quality, by selecting concepts accepted in technical approaches and representations made by the students. It has identified eighteen parameters of quality with three levels classified in each one. The mental model is induced by the argumentales theoric constructions accepted by conceptual systems and common knowledge. The finding of investigation centralizes in the peculiarities of the mental model that have the students in each one of the implied criminals in the study, selected five parameters for the present effects of it publication. Investigacin establishes one comparacin in construccin of the mental models about the university quality in five academic areas in reference.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2006 Oswaldo Orellana Manrique, Lupe García A., Ricardo Pomalaya V., José Morocho S., Roger Elizalde B., Leoncio Solórzano A., Jorge Rivera M., Lidia Sotelo L., Noemí Sotelo L., Marina Salazar C., Daphne Orellana García, José Chávez Z.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Journal of Research in Psychology (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Journal of Research in Psychology.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, lecture notes, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source. of publication (authors of the work, magazine, volume, number and date).
