Thinking Styles in students of UNMSM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v4i1.5004Keywords:
thinking styles, psychometric analysis, reliability, validity, sternbergAbstract
This research deals about the thinking styles proposed by Sternberg, on Freshman students of the Universidad National Mayor de San Marcos (U. N.M. S. M). The participants were a random sample of 501 students, belonging to 19 schools of 5 academic areas of U.N.M.S.M. The results confirm the validity, the construct validity and the reliability of Stenberg 's short form Thinking Styles Questionnaire. The results show that the most frequent styles are the ones related to the judicial junction, the external scope and the hierarchic form on The Least frequent results are the oligarchic form, the local level and the conservative style. Considering academic areas there were statistical differences on the executive and the judicial junction; the monarchic, the hierarchic, the oligarchic and the anarchic forms; the global and local levels; the internal and external scope; the Liberal and conservative styles. Comparing by gender showed statistical significance leniency of male participants on the judicial function; the monarchic form; the global and local level; the external scope; and the Liberal and conservative style.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2001 Luis Miguel Escurra Mayaute, Ana Esther Delgado Vásquez, Rosario Quesada Murillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Journal of Research in Psychology (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Journal of Research in Psychology.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, lecture notes, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source. of publication (authors of the work, magazine, volume, number and date).
