QUECHUA DIALECTICAL AREAS IN SOUTH OF ANCASH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/arqueolsoc.2002n14.e12727Abstract
Phonologic and morphologic isoglosses let us recognize in the spoken Quechuafrom the south of Ancash, in the territory which belonged to the ancient Bolognesi province, the following more exclusive dialecticformations: Alto Pativilca Quechua, Callejón de Huaylas Quechua, Yaru Quechua, anda Quechua that preserves *le/and *le/. These dialect variants have been identified according to the analysis of the morphologic isoglosses referred to the treatment of the second person marks and the verbal pluralizer; so the following phonologic isoglosses: vocal cluster ofthe sequences lay/, /iy/ and /aw/, "desafricación" of *le/, fronting of *le/and dispalatalization ofll// andlñl. The data allowed us identify Pativilca Riveras a very old dialect border between a Yaru Quechua variety, and another Huaylas kind. In the same manner the linguistic clues indicates the presence ofQuechua elements Cajatambo kind in the south ofAncash, at the other side of the river, is relatively recently; but a/so we can see a retum of Quechua language in the zone ofits primigenia/ matrix Huaylas kind.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2002 Gustavo Solís Fonseca
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate the article published in the Arqueología y Sociedad (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Arqueología y Sociedad.
c. The authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source. of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
