ESTIMACIÓN DE RIESGO DE DESASTRE EN LAS QUEBRADAS DE SANTA CECILIA Y PILACUCHO DEL BARRIO SANTA ANA, AYACUCHO, 2014

Authors

  • Freddy León Nina Universidad Nacional San Cristóbal de Huamanga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15381/arqueolsoc.2016n32.e13329

Keywords:

Natural, hazards, disaster risk and vulnerability, analysis technology

Abstract

The systematic study of the vulnerability of the streams of Santa Cecilia, La Union and Pilacucho of the Santa Ana, aims to generate knowledge on disaster-risk in different areas; estimation, frequency, calculation and risk analysis. Considering the existing natural hazard and geological, hydrometeorological and environmental scenarios to climate change (CC); marginalization of rural families have mostly been established in despicable land increasingly less secure physically and poverty levels have increased steadily with dire social consequences because they increase the risk and vulnerability to disasters. We use a whole methodology of parameters and levels recommended by the National Center for Estimation, Risk Reduction and Disaster Prevention (CENEPRED) and as a result was obtained Vulnerability; Pilacucho Quebrada is a critical area exposed to higher incidence of recurrent hazards such as flooding and pollution, which represent very high risks. Instead, the vulnerability prevalence rate is 80%, considered highly vulnerable, which means populations have poor responses to address the negative effects of natural and environmental disasters. It is recommended to develop a Comprehensive Management Plan of the Downs.

Author Biography

  • Freddy León Nina, Universidad Nacional San Cristóbal de Huamanga
    Profesor Auxiliar del Área de Geografía de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, de la Universidad Nacional de San Cristóbal de Huamanga

Downloads

Published

2017-06-15

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES

How to Cite

ESTIMACIÓN DE RIESGO DE DESASTRE EN LAS QUEBRADAS DE SANTA CECILIA Y PILACUCHO DEL BARRIO SANTA ANA, AYACUCHO, 2014. (2017). Arqueología Y Sociedad, 32, 323-342. https://doi.org/10.15381/arqueolsoc.2016n32.e13329