The current state of crisis in post-processual archaeology. An analysis from the theoretical development model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/arqueolsoc.2024n41.e28089Keywords:
Theory, post-processual, epistemology, anomalies, crisisAbstract
This article provides an epistemological analysis of the theoretical components of post-processual archaeology throughout its history. I use the development model that indicates the stages of scientific theories. The analysis describes that the inconsistency between these components has led to post-processual archaeology into a crisis situation.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Miguel Guevara Chumacero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THE AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate the article published in the Arqueología y Sociedad (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Arqueología y Sociedad.
c. The authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source. of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
