Psychometric evaluation of the financial culture scale in university students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15381/quipu.v32i68.29235Keywords:
competencies, validity, reliability, educational intervention, instrumentAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the Financial Culture Scale as a psychometrically robust tool for measuring the key dimensions of financial culture in university students in Peru. Methods: A quantitative study was conducted, including the analysis of items through polychoric correlations and the examination of the internal structure and reliability of the instrument. Results: The validity (X²/gl = 3.65; CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.99; SRMR = 0.03; RMSEA = 0.05; PNFI = 0.91) and reliability of the ESCF were demonstrated, with values exceeding 0.70 and an average variance extracted (AVE) greater than 0.50 in all all dimensions. Conclusion: The validity and reliability of the ESCF have been demonstrated, supporting its use as an effective tool in research. The findings indicate that the model fits the data, suggesting that the evaluated dimensions are consistent and relevant. This provides a solid foundation for future research and applications of the ESCF in various contexts, ensuring that the results are reliable and useful for informed decision-making.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eloyna Lucia Peñaloza Arana, Renzi Marilu Loza Ticona, Marizol Candelaria Arámbulo Ayala de Sánchez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS:
a. Authors retain their trade mark rights and patent, and also on any process or procedure described in the article.
b. Authors retain their right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article (eg, to place their article in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Quipukamayoc .
c. Authors retain theirs right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part thereof (eg a compilation of his papers, lecture notes, thesis, or a book), always indicating the source of publication (the originator of the work, journal, volume, number and date).